I dont think we will punish them. We simply cannot trust them.
If they want to be trusted, they need to stand apart from the people who are lying and deceiving us about their tactics and their data gathering.
If they want to be trusted, they need to stand apart from the people who are lying and deceiving us about their tactics and their data gathering.
Will you risk your company's integrity and reputation over hiring someone who had worked for NSA? An undergraduate? A father who had three kids to feed and just took the job to make a living?
Not trusting often turns out to be punishing. And in many cases we simply just discriminate them.
This is a serious issue, a real moral issue.
I cannot save others from the impact of the choices they make. and I would not want to.
You appear to be arguing that we should not judge people based on their actions - I am unsure where that leaves us?
So a driver who drunk drive and lost their legs should have a tag "I was a killer killing fifteen people five years ago and don't build an accessible platform for me"? No of course we don't do that.
Should we try to help those people with disabilities? Yes. Should we go out of our way to help those who decided that they could drive under the influence, and kill 15 people because of their negligence? I think you will find that most people wouldn't even waste the spittle on that person's face.
I should add all of these to my CV just to avoid ppl who would irrationally discriminate (although I'd then be lying on my CV).