I'll quote the relevant part:
""" Although perceptions of bias that discourage fathers from seeking custody are a concern, n52 the outcome of cases in which custody is contested provides a more direct source of information about possible judicial gender bias. We heard testimony from George Kelly, a representative of Concerned Fathers, that in contested custody cases, mothers are awarded physical custody over 90% of the time. Mr. Kelly was unable to provide substantiation, however, n53 and our own investigation revealed a very different picture.
The statewide sample of attorneys who responded to the family law survey had collectively represented fathers seeking custody in over 2,100 cases in the last 5 years. n54 They reported that the fathers obtained primary physical custody in 29% of the cases, and joint physical custody in an additional 65% of the cases. Thus, when fathers actively sought physical custody, mothers obtained primary physical custody in only 7% of cases. The attorneys reported that the fathers had been primary caretakers in 29% of the cases in which they had sought custody.
The preliminary findings of the Middlesex Divorce Research Group relitigation study show a similarly high rate of paternal success, but fewer awards of joint physical custody. In their sample of 700 cases in Middlesex County between 1978 and 1984, fathers had sought custody in 57 cases (8.14% of the sample). In two-thirds of the cases in which fathers sought custody, they received primary physical custody (42% in which fathers were awarded sole legal and sole physical custody, plus [*832] 25% in which fathers were awarded joint legal and primary physical custody). Joint physical and joint legal custody was awarded in 3.5% of cases. In 11% of the cases, mothers received primary physical and joint legal custody; in 12%, mothers were awarded sole legal and physical custody; other custodial arrangements were ordered in the remaining cases. Thus, when fathers sought custody, mothers received primary physical custody in fewer than one-quarter of the cases in the Middlesex study. Information about which parent had been the primary caretaker was not available for the Middlesex cases.
These trends were apparent in an earlier study of a sample of 500 Middlesex County cases filed between 1978 and 1981. Fathers had sought sole custody in about 8% of the cases. They received sole custody in 41% of those cases, and joint custody in 38%. In 5% of the cases, custody went to someone other than a parent. In instances in which fathers sought sole custody, mothers received sole custody in only 15% of the cases (Phear et al., 1983).
These statistics may be a surprise to many. They are, however, consistent with findings in other states. A study of court records in Los Angeles County, California, in 1977 found that fathers who sought sole custody obtained it in 63% of the cases (up from a success rate of 37% in 1972) (Weitzman, 1985, p. 233). A nationwide survey of all reported appellate decisions in child custody cases in 1982 found that fathers obtained custody in 51% of the cases, up from an estimated 10% in 1980 (Atkinson, 1984).
The high success rate of fathers does not by itself establish gender bias against women. Additional evidence, however, indicates that women may be less able to afford the lawyers and experts needed in contested custody cases (see "Family Law Overview") and that, in contested cases, different and stricter standards are applied to mothers. """
Now, try discussing that. Beceause this is what you'll get once you'll present a study showing men are better soldiers than women to a feminist. And nobody cares. Equality at the Army, period. Actually special treatment for women because apparently they need to run just 4 miles to get to the Marines when males have to run 6 miles. Because obviously the enemy will stop 2 miles short just to treat our female soldiers better than others. Or like this precious thing that a women in the uniform can't have be moving machine gun. It is too heavy for her for goodness sake. This is all about special treatment and not equality.
So maybe that's how we (males) should start rolling as well. 50% cases children go to the fathers, period. If you don't agree you are a sexist xenophobic in need of a psychological treatment for aggression impulses and the whole study is a hate speech.
"I agree with something you never said" is a 14-year-old's debate tactic, right up there with "stop hitting yourself". Which is unsurprising, because the logic of "MensRights" is mired in about the same developmental stage.
Why would anyone take you seriously ever again after you wrote a comment like this? I do not know, and think that they should not.
That's how I know I talk to a feminist.
Other left-wingers like Marxists - you need to spend some time showing them your argumentation before they give up and do that. Start attacking a person instead of attacking argumentation or addressing issues.
Feminists go to that right away. Again, not surprised at all. You are very angry group of people indeed. And that's why in most polls women disagree with feminists. Nobody likes angry mean person who attacks messenger instead of addressing issues calmly.
So, why not to, start social marxist change also in court rulings. Let's explain fathers they should take responsibility for children in 50% of divorce cases. Let's have legislation enforcing that. Let's have think-tanks to make it happen.
I don't really care, I love working with women. My only problem is that things born in Marxist ideology like feminism are making social experiments on us whether we want it or not. And none of these left wing dreamed of social experiments work.
Why are we putting all these women under so much pressure? You have to be in IT. There are not enough women there. You must be good in IT. And what about this what women want to do? Women's psyche is more gentle than ours. You show thin teens on magazine covers long enough and next thing you know you deal with anorexia/bulimia pandemic. You create social pressure for them not to have kids, to delay having family, to go there and compete in brutal business world. What gives you right to do that?
Have you read the article under which we are commenting? The author is not happy. She definitely feels like her life choices were forced upon her. All I'm saying is that this is wrong. You don't feel social pressure to be a good cook, or spend 8 hours a day with a kid. Feminism hurts women, not men. This is what the article shows.
A review of the cases does not support your claim. 8% of fathers demand custody because 8% of fathers feel the mother is so bad that the children are better off with the father. The fact that they generally win in such cases is expected, but can not be generalized to imply that if fathers simply seek custody more often, they will still get it that often. When they seek custody in cases where the mother is not abusive, they lose.