It's enough for a luxurious existence in NYC provided you don't have children. I'm not sure whether or not they have children, but that's a lot.
It's enough for a luxurious existence in NYC provided you don't have children. I'm not sure whether or not they have children, but that's a lot.
If you don't work in Manhattan or can work from home most of the time, you can have a pretty luxurious lifestyle, yes.
Also, being single with no one to support isn't the average case. I'd argue we should assume that each working person supports one other person. That lines up with American demographics much better.
Yes, there are people making vastly more than $150k, but that doesn’t change the fact that it puts one solidly in the upper quartile.
It's that's "only" middle class, the world is in serious trouble.
It's the loan I took out to pay for my 4 year undergraduate university education in it's entirety.
Is that better?
I was referring to what that salary gets you in terms of standard of living and so on. Cost of living in all of New York, Manhattan especially, is high. $70k doesn't get you very far in Manhattan, especially if you don't have multiple roommates (which you wouldn't if you had a family).
Contrast that to what a family can do with $70k in Cleveland, San Antonio, or Raleigh. It looks closer to what $150k looks like in Manhattan, which is my point.
$150k is most definitely upper middle class. I grew up in Queens my whole life and until I started working professionally, never met someone who made more than $150,000 a year.