Hacker News Reader

Comment by mynegation | Hacker News Reader

So what would be the advantage over Dropbox? Storage price? It is not a big issue for me personally.

Basically what I want is the Dropbox clone with client side encryption, with open-source client that is able to work either with proprietary servers or (better yet), open-source server and/or with S3 and other backends.

Edit: I'll check out SparkleShare!

View on HN

Client side encryption is coming [in beta] soon.

with a python api please? so that i can read and write data encrypted using python with my own keys.

You can do client-side encryption with Dropbox or Google Drive, nothing is stopping you from doing it.

I have an encrypted EncFS volume that I keep in Google Drive and it has been working really well, being synced between 3 computers. I'm on Ubuntu and in Ubuntu it's easy to create an Encfs volume with the Gnome Encfs Manager. Just make sure you pick a strong encryption password.

What I like about this approach is that I don't want all files to be encrypted, only my documents, certificates, licenses and so on. But I don't want to encrypt the PDFs in my technical books collection, because I want those PDFs to be accessible from anywhere. I also have an iPad for example, I use the GDrive client to download the PDFs and open it in Adobe's Reader.

Therefore I have two problems with alternatives to well established cloud storage, like Dropbox and GDrive:

- hosting your files on S3 or on some instance somewhere costs more - I need clients for Linux (workstation), OS X (workstation), Windows (my wife), Android (my phone) and iPad (my ebook reader)

It would be nice to let us know what's on the roadmap. I like the product, but I feel a bit blind on what you're going to add next.

I use ownCloud for this, though it doesn't hit every feature you want, but it does have a lot of other stuff I needed (CalDAV and CardDAV server, and a stack of other neat apps that are finally getting native app counterparts on mobile!). I now host all my own data, yay!

Thanks for suggesting this. I will check it out.

I just recently started using Bittorrent Sync just for the ability that I can "host" all of my own files, and not rely on S3, DropBox, etc.

My thing is is that I'm pretty damn good with PHP, so it's also fun for me to hack on, as well as being pretty damned powerful (and solid, as of v5) :)

I'll plug SpiderOak here. Pretty decent prices and service, but their client was pretty awful the last time I used it... and encryption vastly slows the file sync (at least, it seemed so).

Hope that helps you though!

Thank you for chiming in. I am a paid user of SpiderOak. And it is great... when it works. I was able to get through rather complicated interface and I am OK most of the time with slower sync performance, but sometimes it just breaks out of the blue. Also, the client is not open-source. Granted they have open-source projects on the same infrastructure (nimbus.io) but this is something else.

They don't mention client side encryption, only encrypted connection (naturally for SSL, and HTTPS for S3 I guess). If they don't support it, it would be a deal breaker for me.

Does Sparkleshare do client-side encryption? I didn't think so, since it's based on git.

It does, it's right in the home page. Judging from the source, it encrypts files individually on top of Git.

Indeed, it's right at the top! Oops. Thanks for pointing that out.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com