Vatican, Oxford put ancient manuscripts online
cbc.ca
cbc.ca
In parts of the European Union, the CC-NC provision essentially amounts to a complete uselessness of the document, because of the weird definitions of the word "commercial".
For instance, here in Germany, if you have a blog, no advertisements, make no money out of it, but you have thousands of followers, you are acting in "commercial scope" (ie. you are too successful to be non-commercial), thus inviting all the nastyness of being sued for commercial copyright infringement.
The only thing I can do with a CC-NC document without legal risk is to look at it.
The sad thing is, that now nobody will bother to scan these documents and put them online under a different license, since "they are already out there for free!!".
It is quite likely that nobody involved with the project knew this, which goes to show how dangerous the NC-provision is.
A number of juristicions do though. Including (maybe) the UK.
Also if license is in English, the English definition of 'commercial' should apply. It should be translated 'for profit' to German.
Personally, I am interested in Da Vinci's Codex Atlanticus. Is that available yet?
The buttons are small and people often hit the wrong one. Especially on mobile.