Khosla Ventures is joining the YCVC Program
blog.ycombinator.com
blog.ycombinator.com
On another note, here's a recent anecdote (the plural of anecdote is not data!) about Khosla Ventures. A successful entrepreneur ($300M exit under his belt; CEO of $5B company) was in advanced talks (post-term sheet) to raise funding from them. Out of the blue, Khosla came back with a list of demands such as adding a 3rd co-founder. Obviously just one situation, but left a bit of a bad taste in my mouth.
I don't have much (any) data on this, and no professional stake in this. I'm just fascinated by the YC model in general, and by a way of "buying the market" for emerging companies. (The closest thing to an S&P for startups) That, and I'm tired of arguing about unions on the other thread.
off-topic - I'm a fan of what your company is doing.
But this might be an annoyance considering him aiming for $300M return/year or so in his later-stage fund.
I'm not sure it was that popular or that Khosla declared it as his own.
Buchwald based his decision on the 1848 Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, which settled the Mexican-American War, and required that the United States recognize Mexican land grants as long as the owner filed a claim. The original owner of the coastal property filed such a claim. The U.S. government challenged his land patent, but the U.S. Supreme Court confirmed his ownership in 1859 -- 14 years before the California Constitution was first drafted.
I can't make head nor tail of this.[1]
EDIT: OK, this[2] is clearer:
The judge's ruling skirts the fundamental conflict between the rights of private property owners and the rights of Californians to access the shoreline. Instead, Buchwald rooted his decision in the land's history during the mid-19th century. Since there was no public easement attached to the property at the time the United States acquired California from Mexico, the judge reasoned, the question of whether the California Constitution now guarantees access to the beach is immaterial.
The original owner of the property was Jose Maria Alviso, who received a provisional land grant from the Mexican government in the late 1830s. He later transferred the property to his brother, Jose Antonio Alviso, whose rights to the property were upheld under the 1848 Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, which settled the Mexican-American War. The U.S. government challenged Alviso's land patent, but the Supreme Court confirmed Alviso's ownership in 1859.
[1] http://www.nbcbayarea.com/Vinod-Khosla-Can-Keep-Public-Off-B...
[2] http://www.mercurynews.com/breaking-news/ci_24380282/vinod-k...