Amazon said to launch Pantry to take on Costco, Sam's
usatoday.com
usatoday.com
[1] http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2013/dec/01/week-amazo...
[1] http://mynorthwest.com/646/2378309/Bezos-rules-Amazon-employ...
Once we eliminate the need for employment to provide the basics then shitty jobs will go away. Until then they have a place.
It is unnecessary to make these jobs MORE shitty by bad management.
For example, the worst thing IMO that Walmart does (IDK about Amazon), is to mandate that employees be on call 24x7 to be ready to come in for a shift on short notice (3 hours). This cripples the worker from taking on a 2nd job, school, or anything else. This traps them into the Walmart job & makes this not an entry level job.
There are many tiers of employment at amazon and the same for costco, I'm wondering if the great costco benefits also apply to their hourly warehouse employees or their equiv on the amazon side.
http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2013/12/08/costco-whol...
If their wages and treatment aren't enough to drive them to quit their jobs, they are sufficient.
I am glad Prime costs what it does and not more.
Compare to Amazon, which sells multiple versions of the same SKUs from slightly different retailers (with slightly different shipping methods), and then hundreds of slightly different items all with a wide variance in quality and you spend hours reading reviews and comparison shopping. It's "ok" to do from home, but I frankly have better things to do with my time most of the time. However, for those really hard to find items, or ones that Costco simply doesn't carry, it's totally worth to shop at Amazon.
I believe Walmart/Sam's Club, Costco, and Target have a decided advantage on the real estate/fulfillment center side. Every store can be a "fulfillment center". The trick for these guys is going to be not waiting until the foot traffic dries up before they attack Amazon directly. And of course they already are to some extent, but if you read these articles about Amazon that seem to appear every week, the perception seems to be that the old players have no chance at competing.
A huge caveat for Amazon is they still don't make a profit. Whether that's by choice, I'm not really sure.
http://www.theguardian.com/business/2012/sep/24/tesco-dark-s...
says that they've started to build additional delivery-only stores(/warehouses?) in areas where their is sufficient demand to warrant it.
Doing it this way meant the managed to avoid the huge upfront costs in building specialist warehouses, and instead used their existing network of hundreds of stores that exist all over the UK.
Competing with Best Buy and Barnes and Noble is going to be a lot easier than competing with Wal-Mart.
Assuming that this is true, I think this is a brilliant, long-tail, idea from Amazon. If the kids get accustomed to seeing Amazon boxes full of stuff arrive every week, when they move out on their own they probably will also buy from Amazon. Similar to computer manufacturers (e.g. Apple, Microsoft) giving educational discounts to schools/students. It's hard to know if this implementation will work but I would start worrying if I were Costco/Sam's. Amazon has shown that they do find innovative approaches to markets. If this approach doesn't work they'll come out that will later on.
Where else can I get meat that I know has been properly inspected (and if it hasn't, Costco will remove it from the shelves)? Buy fresh vegetables at a cost lower than my local King Soopers or Safeway.
Amazon will never replace those for me, also, being 25 I tend to procrastinate, I don't have time to wait for Amazon to ship me cleaning supplies. When I am out I want it now, drop by Costco I get it now... that's important to me. I don't think Costco has anything to be afraid of.
I find that there is lots of waste in my buying habits for a couple reasons; I typically only need half or so of the buy able serving size of many things, but would prefer the prices of bulk items.
An interesting model would be to allow several people, ideally geographically close to one another, but not necessarily friends with eachother, to build a communal list of standard/often purchased items.
When some threshold is met, the items are purchased and divided among the buyers.
The items would need to be divisible easily by the number of buyers...
A service like this should also focus on minimalist packaging.
Set the fee at stepped level, $25 $50 $75 $100 -- and I just have a running list of items I use regularly. When enough people need the same things and my buy threshold is met, the box ships, I am billed and the counter restarts until the next month/interval.
There should be a simple way to report how quickly you consume an item and the system would determine the larger average consumption rates over time and make suggestions on how often items should be added.
The amount of extra time it takes for my wife and I to buy groceries there easily costs more then any potential savings. I suspect it adds over an hour to our trip rather then buying from our local grocer. This doesn't even factor in the stress of driving there, finding parking etc. I think I will continue to walk to the closest store and pay a little more at the checkout.