Gmail’s Recent Image Handling Changes
blog.movableink.com
blog.movableink.com
Do they have gmail passwords so only they can advertise on my email?
https://support.google.com/mail/answer/145919?p=display_imag...
This is an inherent flaw with auto-displayed mail images loaded on demand. They are easily rigged to act as read receipts.
Hard to see how that's a privacy enhancement.
www.example.com/banner.png?userid=1
www.example.com/banner.png?userid=2
www.example.com/banner.png?userid=3
and so on. How would you propose caching that? You can't simply ignore the GET parameters since many web services use those to distinguish between different files. And anyways you could even get around that by using URLs like www.example.com/userid/1/banner.png
www.example.com/userid/2/banner.png
www.example.com/userid/3/banner.png
While I do applaud the decision to route all images through Google servers to hide the user's location, I'm disappointed that images are enabled by default.It is a usability feature.
I can attest that my own mother has no idea why the pictures in her emails don't show up. If this keeps her privacy (or at least what shreds of it remain) and makes it easier, then I don't have a problem with it.
Personally, spam is a thing of the past. Between using multiple email addresses that forward to a few main ones, to spam assassin and Gmail's spam filtering, I haven't seen a spam in years. Even if I did, I highly doubt it would get me to open it.
That leaves promotional emails, which, if I'm opening, I already have an interest in and might as well just see the images. It saves me a click. Rare would be the case where I'm interested in an email enough to open it, but not enough to see the images it contains (which often make reading it a more pleasant experience in the case of headers, gradients, and the like).