EU data retention in current form is likely to fall
translate.google.com
translate.google.com
Which might take a while.
http://www.telecompaper.com/news/enisa-recommends-tighter-se...
But in all honesty, the current directive was already a dead man walking after the German implementation was killed by the German constitutional court. And AFAIK, Germany is not the only country where the directive has run afoul of constitutional protections.
That, plus the fact that in countries like Sweden and Denmark intelligence agencies have already abused the directive to go completely NSA on their own population is just adding nails to the coffin.
The EU data retention directive may not be technically dead yet, but it smells and looks like a corpse already. And reviving it in the current post-Snowden climate is unlikely.
The FRA law and EU data retention has all been to increase the warehouse supply of data. Its not about spying on our own population. The warehouses are simply getting empty, and the Minister for Foreign Affairs feels unimportant. The Snowden documents was quite clear on this, and gives the suggestion that US diplomats should throw a bone to him once in a while to reinforce this behavior so more and more information can be extracted.
So not only are we merchants of spying, but bad ones at getting anything in return.
I can't agree with you more on this issue. Sadly, this point is often overlooked - even by the Irish public. A bit of insight shows that Ireland, with its recent history of colonial sufferings, has yet again 'prostituted' [1] itself to imperialism through unbelievable tax loopholes for US tech giants.
One could expand further and argue that the Irish political class also willingly enslaved the people to financial 'colonialism' when they nationalized private bank debt.
As a Danish resident, I'm interested in information about this (I already know about Sweden). Do you have any source?