> I've been offline for a bit. Has anyone made the point that Edward Snowden is today's Nelson Mandela?
Probably not, because it's a very poor comparison.
Probably not, because it's a very poor comparison.
Nelson Mandela was considered a terrorist by authorities in power at the time, and was accused of treason, as is Snowden I believe. History judges Mandela otherwise, and deems him a hero. Will the same be true for Snowden? I guess it really is the same old debate that has been going on - is Snowden a hero or a traitor guilty of treason, and how will the answer to that question differ, if at all, in 25 to 30 years? Nothing new here besides the context in which the question is posed, which may or may not be valid.