By clearly you mean writing short articles that you can finish in five minutes? Adam Curtis always builds his stories with historical events to conclude with a point which is relevant today. You need to be patient to appreciate some of his stuff.
By clearly you mean writing short articles that you can finish in five minutes? Adam Curtis always builds his stories with historical events to conclude with a point which is relevant today. You need to be patient to appreciate some of his stuff.
Except, when the majority of things I read are crap (and honestly, a post littered with videos typically is) I tend to come at articles with a "prove I should finish reading you" kind of attitude.
The beginning of this post wasn't very successful at capturing my attention. It would seem he has a very similar style as Venkat (though I think Venkat is a better writer) from RibbonFarm. I guess the difference is I have a general expectation that I realize he's building up to something bigger... and that conclusion might even be 3 or 4 posts from this long post. However he's earned my patience.
prove I should finish reading you
Maybe you can persist with reading through an article when you see it being very popular on Hacker News?