See also http://www.kickstarter.com/blog/kickstarter-is-not-a-store
Why shouldn't Kickstarter be considered to be a store and be bound by store-like rules?
Alternately, what if Walmart decided they weren't a store either?
All very different from your regular store where the basis of your contract is, usually via terms of service, "pay X to receive good Y within period Z".
I don't know anything about that particular case, but in general, what do you think Kickstarter can/should do about it?
The creator has been extremely silent the last few months except for claiming bankruptcy - yet that claim hasn't even been verified and the backers basically have no clue about what to do know. It would be nice if KS could jump in and help them investigating this or tell them how/where they should go to court?
Kickstarter doesn't need to act to protect backers, it needs to act to protect its own position. Hopefully, though, the same solutions will serve both ends.
On the other hand, you hear stories about projects who offer too much ("I'll paint a portrait of anyone who donates $7!"), and all their money goes to servicing those rewards.
I don't mean to excuse anyone. Obviously, not everyone is capable of running a business, and Kickstarter makes it really easy for those people to get themselves into hot water.
So what?
This morning I received a return phone call from the Indiana Southern Bankruptcy Court regarding my inquiry about Mr. Steele's bankruptcy claim. They have searched all the courts in the US and could not find any bankruptcy filings
moreover if you read the comments it's obvious the creator hasn't been honest, and possibly took his IP to some other company. Possibly, cause it's again hard to verify.Thanks for clarifying!