That may sound like a lot, but I'd imagine the actual point difference is on the order of 2 points.
The more interesting thing to consider would be whether taking a safety there is ever a positive.
That may sound like a lot, but I'd imagine the actual point difference is on the order of 2 points.
The more interesting thing to consider would be whether taking a safety there is ever a positive.
This bot also requires both coaches to follow it's recommendations, because otherwise the comparison between what they call "point values" of the two teams becomes meaningless.
It seems though he gave up some amount of EV by giving up the 2 points to the Broncos, thus a FG later on would only tie the game instead of winning it. But I assumed this was offset by the risk of having to punt and the Broncos end up getting a FG where then they'd be up by 4 points.
I don't know if Belichick was right to do this, but it paid off for him which is why everyone pats him on the back.
Contrast this with the 2009 Colts/Pats game where he went for it on 4th and 2 on his own 28 and didn't make it.
Going for it on 4th and 2 in the '09 game was the right decision, and few knowledgeable commentators disparaged Belichick for it. Manning was dissecting the Pats defense at that point in the game: He had a much greater chance of scoring a touchdown than the Colts defense had of stopping the conversion.
Now the playcall...