As someone also in Edinburgh (UK) who has seen first hand the good work she does for the community, please support her!
There is literally zero information here. Girlgeeks might as well be a 4chan harrassment account.
> This has happened before, she gets targeted for her great work in trying to balance gender equality in tech.
It sounds like you're implying a causal relationship between these two clauses, i.e. it has happened before because she gets targeted for her work. But the link posted in this thread suggests no such relationship.
> for no good reason then.
Are you not aware of a reason (but maybe she knows something you don't), or is she not aware of a reason, or are you aware of a reason and it's not a good one?
(I'm not asking because I expect there to be a good reason. But e.g. if twitter has told @girlgeeks what's going on, and you just aren't privy to those communications, then that's very different to the situation where twitter hasn't told @girlgeeks what's going on.)
> These things happen because she gets targeted for her work.
Cite? The information in this thread so far is that this has happened once before for unrelated reasons.
What other interpretation is there?
And even if this were they case, the article also states "I am inclined to believe that this particular incident was not the result of malice, either on the side of the trademark owner or Twitter - it was simply an error of judgement, and those happen to the best of us."
So where are all of these accusations about people "targeting" her coming from?