A Warning: Do not turn in illegal files you found to the police.
boards.4chan.org
boards.4chan.org
A few months ago I posted here looking for help with a SD card I found while renovating a school. It was hidden in a wall outlet, and had several files with names on them, and obviously was a bunch of encrypted containers.
Well, I managed to brute force one of them and inside was more containers, but a month ago I managed to open another and this time there was videos and pictures, stuff that made me go to the cops right away.
So I turned over everything to them and told them all I knew, and that's when the bullshit began. Right from the start the police thought I had something to do with it. They took every device in my home that could store data, my phone, my laptops and computers, my PS3, even all my USB drives and camera. They questioned my family and went to my job and harassed everyone that I had any contact with,
Right now I still haven't gotten any of my property back, and my friends and family think I am a creep. I am writing this to give a warning to everyone that works with IT if they end up in a situation like me. Don't go to the authorities, don't try and do the right thing, don't say a fucking thing just destroy what you found and move on. Trying to be a good person is just going to fuck your life over
He brute forced two encrypted containers? Who does that for an SD card you find?
And hidden in a wall outlet? Really? Someone just walks around carrying a screwdriver for opening wall outlets, and hopes not to get shocked? There are far easier places to hide things.
And cops questioning family and job contacts for this?
Sorry, but I don't believe a word of it.
Though if you do ever happen to come across an SD card filled with encrypted child pornography, personally decrypting it and turning it in to the police is probably not the brightest course of action.
> not the brightest course of action.
Sounds like victim blaming to me.
It would be victim blaming if I thought he were actually a real person, but the latter part was entirely a well-intentioned tip to any person who actually finds himself in a similar situation. At least talk to a lawyer before traipsing into someplace dangerous like the police office.
IMHO it's not stupid to go to the cops with evidence of wrongdoing, at worst it's being naive and trusting... at best it's simply doing the correct thing without delay. How would anyone know otherwise, without such "rabble rousing" anecdotes, or first-hand experience?
What really is stupid are such reactions of police. We shouldn't seek to teach people to mistrust the police, that is just a crappy short-term workaround; we should teach the police to be worthy of trust. Don't ask me how, it's just when I'm roused I get these big ideas :)
To me the op is no different from people who participate in ARGs. Only in this case, the prize at the end of the game was a ruined life.
If the police behavior sounds implausible, you haven't read any stories about similar cases.
Except, you know, the game part of ar_G_. Real life is not a video game. If you live as if it is, something bad is probably going to happen to you eventually. Brute forcing something that doesn't belong to you is not just bad form, it's stupid, and depending on what it happens to be, possibly illegal.
Does that make the police harassing him OK? Perhaps not. Is any part of this story even true? Also perhaps not.
My point is that his mindset is essentially the same: He ran across an intriguing puzzle and tried to solve it.
As for the "hidden in a wall outlet", I don't know why that sounds outlandish to you. I've worked in construction, and had to remove wall outlets all the time...never once got shocked. Plus, Walter White did it so it's got to be a logical and prudent thing to do. Right?
If I found an sd card with encrypted files I'd be curious as hell.
Maybe the guy who hid it got the idea from Breaking Bad.
Well, assuming that I have some sort of reasonably good setup where I'm not having to spend all my time doing it.
I would _totally_ do that for any encrypted files that came into my possession via an apparently discarded device. My curiosity would be through the roof. Of course, if I found illegal stuff... I'd burn the medium, throw the medium into the ocean, throw the ocean into the sun, and throw the sun into the moon.
Since the vast majority of these are encrypted with a simple text passcode, dictionary attacks are pretty routine against them.
http://home.schmorp.de/marc/fcrackzip.html
http://rarcrack.sourceforge.net
(as two examples)
The net result: cops' job gets harder, and they only have themselves to blame for alienating the people who should be their allies. At least maximum employment will be guaranteed for them.
There are plenty of places in the U.S. where this has been the case for decades.
Link is 404'ing now.
It simply cannot be that neither side - groups pushing for stronger prosecution of crime and ones pushing for decriminalization of petty crimes [4][5][6] - likes it , yet does nothing to ease tensions and head towards less contentious state of affairs.
I suspect the groups who stand to benefit from this state of morass have cozy relations between them and are likely :
a) the private prison lobby like CCA [1]
b) the police unions [2] and
c) the prison guard lobby like CCPOA [3]
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corrections_Corporation_of_Amer...
[2] http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/12...
[3] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Correctional_Peace_O...
[4] http://www.salon.com/2013/09/23/6_shocking_revelations_about...
[5] http://dyn.realclearpolitics.com/printpage/?url=http://www.r...
[6] http://www.salon.com/2013/11/22/humans_shipped_across_the_co...
Edit: Corrections
Even if the overall result is a detriment to myself.
People can sense bullshit and/or malice. I've bullshitted my way out of situations due to my obvious non-malicious intent. But have been 'boned' by trying to bullshit my way out of malicious acts.
Do you disagree? Are there examples where you would talk to the police? For example, if your home was broken into?
The point is that anything you say can be used against you for any of an infinity of possible crimes, while it can never ever help you at all.
Though clearly the situation here is not one where the victim was invited to speak, if he had taken the advice to heart, he would have realized that speaking to the police in any capacity is extremely dangerous, and perhaps averted this disaster.
Let's be clever here, don't be dumb. The right thing to do is to turn on your cellphone's camera and start recording.
http://www.reddit.com/r/everymanshouldknow/comments/1rsizj/e...
No = admission of negligence
The only right answer is a non-answer: "Hold on, lemme get my license and registration."
* "I do not consent to any searches."
* "I wish to remain silent."
* "I want a lawyer."
Stay safe broes!
No need to make things complicated.
some useful information. followed by a reddit thread which may be less useful.
But I will remember actions of a person. I've had more non-hatted folks fuck me over than the other.
Again just a single source of stats. Nothing to draw from.
Would you continue to recommend it?
And yes, a surprisingly large number of people who watch it say that in the above circumstances, they would wait for a lawyer before saying "the kidnappers drove north".
If you're innocent and have information that could potentially help stop a criminal from committing more crimes (as in OP's case, assuming his story is true), I think that in most cases it's totally reasonable to talk to the police, since the benefit to society would almost always outweigh the small possibility of being wrongly convicted of a crime. If you know that you're suspected of a crime, or that the police are likely to suspect you of a crime after you give them information (as OP potentially could have foreseen), then the question gets harder. Even when you know that you're suspected of a crime, I still think "Never talk to the police" is often overly-selfish, depending on the circumstances.
There is, generally, no way to "brute force" an encrypted container containing child pornography for the simple reason that no one who respects the gravity of the situation would dare choose a password less than 8 characters. Even 8 a-z characters requires (26^8)/2==104.4 billion attempts to bruteforce on average, which is high. Real passwords are likely longer.
I realize how flimsy this argument is. They could've chosen a dictionary word as their password, which could indeed be brute forced. All I'm encouraging is for people to think. Turning in evidence of child pornography is the only way that child pornographers will be caught. Having the reaction of "don't go to authorities" will yield a worse society. Is our attitude really to be "fuck society, I'm looking out for myself"?
If a police pull you over, don't look for verbal fight. Yes, you should ask "wassup, officer, what's the matter?". But don't start saying "I want a lawyer" if this is some speeding ticket or some ID check. Doing so is stupid - you are wasting police force patrolling. We got a lot of knockout game assault lately. I want more police patrolling. More.
Be clever. Just turn on video recorder on your cell phone and walk to the police. If you feel uncomfortable and you feel harassed, sure, use your right and tell the police you want a lawyer.
People have always distrust the authority, but ironically they always want more protections. I have dealt with quite a few police officers in my life and I find all of them friendly and reasonable. Just remain clam. Guys have pressures too - getting yell at and middle finger at every single fucking day on the street, worrying the next big time crime comes up at their face and die while enforcing law.
Yes, there are some assholes among the polices, but the majority are just everyone else's friend and family. We have assholes in IT, in fire fighters, in the army, in the government, in schools, in everywhere.
Whatever reason is behind this "unreasonable searches", let the story reveal on the news then. Let a general attorney get involved. On the other hands, I think it is reasonable for a police to actually ask to check if the contents have been wiped out or not. If you were told X person has decrypted the card and played the videos, you as the state probably want to ensure this content has not been saved in any more device. Yes, sounds stupid, but I think that's reasonable. Think about this - a child was raped and a cracker hacked into X's computer and distributed this file - is that bad? I am not saying the whole questioning family and friend is reasonable, I am not a law enforcer, but the other parts still seem reasonable.
-- EDIT --
I actually was a whistleblower myself once. I did the same thing the OP did. I turned in a child pornography evidence. Well, a bunch of people did because this was distributed online. At the time I was just a high school kid and I was managing a popular discussion forum. It was reported by some members on our forum and as a manager I decided to turn this over to the Taiwanese police by pointing them where this source was discovered. I submitted anonymously, however. I still encourage people to be a whistleblower / be a good citizen / good person at some point. We need to arrest these horrible assholes.
That's just not true. People viewing images of child sexual abuse used to buy access using their credit card - Pete Townsend for one. (Obviously we need to be careful here; lots of crooks were using stolen credit cards).
Many people viewing images of child sexual abuse just aren't very good at encryption or anonymity.
See "DeAnonymizing alt.anonymous.messages" http://ritter.vg/blog-deanonymizing_amm.html
> The slides cover the information-theoretic differences between SSL, Onion Routing, Mix Networks, and Shared Mailboxes. It talks about the size of the dataset I analyzed, and some broad percentages of the types of messages in it (PGP vs Non-PGP, Remailed vs Non-Remailed). Then I go into a large analysis of the types of PGP-encrypted messages there are. Messages encrypted to public keys, to passwords and passphrases, and PGP messages not encrypted at all!
I strongly agree that turning in the card is the only sensible choice. It's a scary option though.
So don't talk about every potential criminal using 2048 strong encryption unless you have something to show for it.
This is even disregarding that court cases show lowest hanging fruit caught.
Nu-uh.
Small GPU clusters - 25 in the beneath case - get you 300 billion guesses a second, more than sufficient to guess a 26^8 password in a couple of seconds.
http://arstechnica.com/security/2012/12/25-gpu-cluster-crack...
He probably only has one GPU working on the problem, but even at as low as a billion guesses a second, you're going to have the password in way less than a day. It's not unreasonable to think that he'd crack it, especially if he just set a computer to working on it for a couple of weeks or so - and I see no reason he wouldn't.
Also, nesting encrypted containers was/is something people do to hide file names on passworded zips. Which doesn't inspire confidence in the skills of the defender in this case. I see no reason someone would have done so if they'd used decent encryption, like a truecrypt volume.
Anyone who wwants to spread distrust about police could write it too, and it would be easier than brute-forcing the SD card.
Keep telling yourself that.
Anyway, independent of the truth of the anecdote, the advice seems sound. Why risk it?
Because depending on exactly what is on that card there may be a child in real pain?
Maybe it's old photos, but if it's recent stuff you can actually help someone.
Doing anything to cover yourself, such as sending it to the cops through the mail anonymously will further raise the chances that the cops will try to pin it on you.
God lord, is that really the standard we want to use for any news source (even social news aggregation, such as Hacker News)? I may be lying but I'm lying well so that's basically as good as the truth?
It seems the more mainstream media I consume, the more I notice faults in the reporting that, even where unintentional, connote bias. A simple, throwaway example from 2 minutes ago; the Grist reported on a possible fracking-induced earthquake. The earthquake was a relatively harmless 3.something, but the illustration for the photo was a large concrete wall that had been deeply cracked[1], as if to suggest that the earthquake had caused it.
In short, it's rare that I read an article from any news source without being able to point out either an inaccuracy, a vagueness or a deliberate misrepresentation of fact. That isn't to suggest that 4chan is inherently more reliable -- clearly, trolls like this happen all the time, and just for the lulz, but I don't see it as inherently less reliable a source either.
[1] - http://grist.files.wordpress.com/2013/11/crack.jpg?w=470&h=2...
ETA:
It seems to me that if someone were to bring in this material, then investigating the "messenger" would be a waste of time. The information you need is largely in the images.
I imagine the first priority (other than decryption) would be to run the images against a national database. If there are images which aren't in the database, then you have new victims which may need immediate help. Then investigate the images for anything which would put a time and a place on the images. Investigating the person who turns these in seems like it would be quite a ways down the list.
I also cant believe so many 4chan retards suggest he should have just burnt it and go on with his life. There might still be kids suffering at the moment or in the future in relation to this, so how can one possibly ignore it ? That feeling of not having atleast tried something to help would haunt me.
The justice system, and the police bureaucracy is working against it's citizens. Something it was designed against from it's inception, so the only fucking reason things are the way they are is corruption and greed. Maybe a privatized prison industry isn't a good idea. Maybe, the bureaucracy is the problem, and that is the issue you should be concerned with.
So this one time there was this one guy who was just, like, totally minding his own business and the police just arrested him. Therefore the United States is a police state and you should never ever talk with cops for any reason whatsoever.
"I was arrested for no reason. Fuck the police!" is a non-story.
Possession of CP is illegal. He went into a police station in possession of CP. Therefore, he is a lawbreaker. Simple as that. Yes, it's stupid...but these laws ARE stupid. You'd be in the exact same situation walking into the police station with a bag of cocaine or a sawed-off shotgun. They don't HAVE to bring charges and might choose not to, but that choice is at their discretion. No?
Hiibel is the main precedent here.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hiibel_v._Sixth_Judicial_Distri...
What follows is my initial thoughts off the top of my head as to how I might attempt to mitigate any accusations. This is not legal advice.
Firstly, if it looks to have been deliberately concealed, contact your building's security and/or the police (non-emergency). Don't touch it yourself at all. I cannot stress this enough. When contacting the police, ask them for instructions on what you should do, and get a name. If you can't stay at the scene until someone arrives, just tell them as much. You should be given a reference number and can update them if you need to be relived by someone.
Odds are, an unknown concealed item that is not likely to be an explosive or drugs is probably of little interest to your typical cop, and (sadly?) they will never get around to looking at it.
There might be some legitimate reasons to investigate further, for example with respect to an organisation's security. If you are in a large organisation, escalate the matter upwards and touch nothing, no matter how tempting. For many good reasons, security/fraud investigations often are on a strict need-to-know basis. Get the appropriate person to contact the police and take their guidance.
Let's assume for the purpose of this post that you are the right person, and there is no existing investigation which this may relate to. Your natural curiosity should be ignored, however, unless you have a genuine concern of data exfiltration or other potentially malicious activities.
But who I am kidding, of course you do, most organisations do! Now you need to make sure you can preserve as much evidence as possible, perform a detailed investigation, but all the time protect yourself from both legal and technical risks. What follows assumes high risk. Do your own judgement on the risks involved and if the steps below mitigate them adequately (they are probably over the top, this is not a bad thing). Assume that before and after each of these there is a "Listen to the police and/or your legal team".
1. Photograph in situ first, ideally with some means to date the photograph. If possible, get a second person involved. If the area is covered by CCTV, get the footage pulled for cross-referencing. Photographs are useful for the higher resolution details.
1a. Record everything on video.
2. Speaking of CCTV, you'll want to get someone to look at the tapes. This is left as an exercise for the reader, especially the bit about making it not soul-destroying manual observation. This point also covers all the non-technical but essential things like "who had access to this area", "do we stock that type of device", etc. Never forget that the old-fashioned non-technical questions can often give the best answers.
2. Use gloves and carefully remove the device. Take note of the environment it was in, with special interest for clues as to how long it has been there. Examine briefly for any markings. Place immediately into clear plastic bag, marking it with a description of the contents and ideally adding tamper seals. Clear plastic bag means you can verify the device hasn't changed. When not performing investigatory work, the bag should be locked in a dedicated place for evidential material.
3. Establish an air-gapped secure system to perform analysis on. Assume that malware will be present and that you will want to be able to detect and analyse it. Ideally have an investigations laboratory to add physical controls around the air-gap.
4. Establish a log book. Record the date, time, action taken, and tamper seal codes before and after. There will be more things you will wish to record, of course - this is only a rough guide.
5. Acquire a write-block device. These are utterly essential for any form of forensic investigation, and typically block at (what courts consider to be) hardware-level any modification to the device.
6. Attach the device to your air-gapped system using the write-blocker. At this point, the air-gapped system is dirty and will need to be forensically wiped/destroyed once you are finished.
7. Using Encase, similar forensic tools, or failing that GNU dd_rescue, image the device. Never, ever, work off the original device. The police and/or auditors may want to take their own copy, this is normal.
8. With respect to the log book, treat this image like the original device. This log book is what you use to back up "I was performing a security investigation". This includes any automated testing or password cracking you attempt.
9. If your organisation handles classified information, it goes without saying that identifying if any is present is your top priority - no matter what the implications that then has
10. Limit who gets to actually view the data on the device to an absolute minimum. You don't know what's there, it could be personal HR information or finances, or that hush-hush restructuring project. The fewer eyes the better. Ideally this should be someone trained in forensic examination and with a high enough clearance to view any potential contents.
11. Know when to give up. Seriously, you could spend years diving into the contents of a 64GB device, and never actually get anything useful.
12. Ask a legal person about how long to retain the device for once you've finished.
13. Assuming you have identified that the contents need further examination, look into eDiscovery tools like Symantec Clearwell, and visualisation tools like the excellent Gephi. Perform technical wizardry rather than wading through a hundred thousand files manually. You're reading hacker news, remember! ;)
14. Assuming that the police have been involved, update them. However if it really is an unknown item and there is otherwise little that is suspicious, they probably won't be that interested and/or will close the call silently.
Apparently I Am Not A Lawyer, And I Repeatedly Assert This Fact. I work in IT Security, and have been involved in quite a few investigations or varying types. Due to their nature, we knew the source of the data on most occasions, so many of the above steps were unnecessary. I'd rather suggest too many protective controls than too few - safer if I know I'm not a lawyer!
http://boston.com/news/globe/ideas/articles/2007/08/05/the_d...
Soon we're going to be a society where no one trusts anyone else, and thus it will be better to ignore the CP flowing around instead of getting involved. Reminds me of the mentality they have in third world countries about the local gangster warlords. Hear nothing, see nothing, say nothing.