Is Scribd a Porn Document Network?
centernetworks.com
centernetworks.com
The question is whether they want to go this direction or not. I know some companies run from it at all costs. Some embrace it. It'll be interesting to see where they go with this, assuming the article is true.
The author can't really make up their mind as to where Scribd is in error: are they using porn to drive up traffic, or do they fail to have right the disclaimer? Going so far as to ask whether it is "acceptable for a VC backed company to drive growth via porn?", the author back pedals and asks for an "Are you OK with this?" dialogue, though the site already has it. (Maybe that changed recently?)
You're still free to add it to any additional group too, but this is essentially Scribd's way of tagging the content.
Huh?
If you only measure groups, you're ignoring the vast majority of uploads which are not added to anything.
The data from this site is highly irrelevant and false. And the Search Analytics is a joke: For example for wikipedia top keywords are "snape kills dumbledore page" and softpedia.com has "vanessa hudgens pictures", mit.edu has "romeo and juliet", slate.com has "girls gone wild"... huh? What is this bs?
It sounds like the adult documents are used to advertise adult sites and so they include outgoing links to adult sites. If that is the case, automatic filtering would be a partial solution.
It would seem fairly trivial for a filter to target the big area that scribd has cordoned off for adult content and leave the rest available.