Forgive me if I'm a little suspicious of this one.
[1] "I’ll spare you the 10,000 pages of literature on a
given topic and give you the one unusual 1-2-3 method that
produced unbelievable results."Forgive me if I'm a little suspicious of this one.
[1] "I’ll spare you the 10,000 pages of literature on a
given topic and give you the one unusual 1-2-3 method that
produced unbelievable results."I know personally, when i do those type of reading, they all give a very conflicting opinion. Example: Vitamin C. Some say 250mg, another say you need 3000mg/day (or even as far as 20000mg/day). Almost every piece of medical advice that i read always have counter-argument. It's so hard to know which one is working without experiment. Even then, i'm not sure how long u need to carry the experiment.
Medical advice based off peer reviewed studies and expert analysis or advice from some quack promising to increase your strength by 30% in 48 hours?
Considering the above and considering that scientists do not seem to agree because the experiments do not seem to give the same results, what made Tim Ferris the arbiter?