It's sad to see that the presumption now is that a man is guilty. Once upon a time, the burden of proof was on the accuser. When Mr Assange is accused of rape, with no proof except the accusation, Mr Assanged is asked to prove his innocence.
I dare say that how someone acts before sex is the most significant indicator on if sex was consensual that we can find.
> (or in this case, they don't use protection and claim they did), it is a crime.
Mind you, would you consider it rape and a crime if a woman said she was on the pill, and slept with you, and it turns out she was lying about it? Let's not keep double standards for the lying men and lying women.
Well, you might, but I can not label this as "rape". If someone lies about using protection, it makes them liars but not rapists.