Snowden stashed “doomsday” cache as insurance policy against harm
arstechnica.com
arstechnica.com
Just distribute to each person 1/3 of the key. If you want to allow any 3 of n-people to decrypt the archives, produce one archive for each combination of possible passwords among the n-people. To make things simple assign each person a letter and name the archives with 3-letter names indicating whose password is necessary and what order to enter the passwords.
My question, is that why should we collect this much intelligence, if it's simply just going to be a disadvantage to our democracy? Surely this has already happened, only with a competing government making the demands opposed to a whistleblower using the information as a shield?
I would be very worried if that new information is so destructive that compared with all that was released till today is still like a doomsday weapon, and thats why it was not released yet. Even if Snowden didn't got that information, that they consider that information that they keep secret is so destructive by itself is just a reminder that so far we seen just the tip of the iceberg, and if you are outraged by what you know that they are doing, you will be far more then realize how deep the rabbit hole goes.