Under "What to Submit": "On-Topic: Anything that good hackers would find interesting. That includes more than hacking and startups. If you had to reduce it to a sentence, the answer might be: anything that gratifies one's intellectual curiosity."
Since it's being upvoted, then I guess it's gratifying enough people's intellectual curiosity.
Taking into account (see my comment "four guesses") the question is would this happen if:
1) Written by a Dental Hygienist at SUNY Binghamton?
2) Published under a community college domain?
3) No link to big money.
4) Place it happened was in a suburb of Cincinnati Oh?
Separately why do people when stating an opinion need to say "I hate to be that guy"?
To me that equates to "I'm not sure of my opinion and treading lightly".
(I really do want to know your thoughts on my question btw.)
This is where this story brings value, because it reveals dark and sinister sides of humans, to leech from people, exploiting their generousity. Regardless of how big the fortunes are, that is incredibly deplorable.
As much as I would love to be both (or either) rich and in NYC, I don't see how this is relevant to the community.
1) Written by Philip Greenspun: "Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology"
2) Published under harvard.edu domain.
3) Money
4) NYC