That said, the erosion of privacy in the name of "think of the children!" is equally a bad thing.
In this case it appears to be a legitimate case of a sexual predator sharing his digital trophies and rightfully being caught.
But "protecting the children" doesn't have to mean giving up our expectations of privacy in the normal course of affairs.
That said, the word you were looking for, is child molester. People need to realize that not all pedofiles act on their attractions, nor that all of them would want to. It's important to note that the feelings of attraction, do not automatically mean they want to rape all children...
It doesn't surprise me that some/most people believe this, but I believe that defending simple truths to be important.
Again, pedantic. But necessary. Especially if people who go by social justice warriors, believe in the persecution of pedofiles who've never commited or will commit a crime.
More like the society doesn't allow discussion on these topics. Any opinion which is not perfectly in line with the "official truth" is not acceptable, so there's no point to talk about it.
However, as much as it would be great to have the freedom to talk about specific topics. I am moreso concerned on figuring out why Google gives a shit, and what else they are hand-delivering to the feds.
Looks like it's reformat, and use a different search engine time.
I sure hope not! Or what was your point again.
You really think that rape of children is equivalent to telling law enforcement about images of that child abuse?