Bonus points for calling it the "Open" Handset Alliance agreement.
http://www.theverge.com/2011/05/12/google-android-skyhook-la...
Bonus points for calling it the "Open" Handset Alliance agreement.
http://www.theverge.com/2011/05/12/google-android-skyhook-la...
And the only carrot has to enforce compliance with the OHA is the google apps suite including chrome. If you don't want chrome and the other google apps, you don't have to comply with their compatibility tests.
HTC
LG
Sony
Samsung Electronics
ASUSTek
Garmin
Huawei Technologies
Sony Mobile Communications (joined as Sony Ericsson)
Toshiba
Acer
ZTE Corporation
Alcatel Mobile Phones
Compal Communications
Dell
Foxconn
Haier
Kyocera
Lenovo Mobile Communication Technology Ltd.
NEC
Sharp Corporation
Saygus Corporation
Care to guess the marketshare of Android handsets not shipped by one of the above?
More and more things are being moved into Google Apps with each Android release. http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2013/10/googles-iron-grip-on-...
Anyway, I don't begrudge Google doing this, I only have an issue with the bastardization of the word "open". AOSP and Android are very different, and when people say Android is open, they actually mean AOSP is open, since Android as shipped on devices is very different and contains a lot of proprietary things.
Exactly what agreement?