I started to notice that and have since moved over to it now. The feature updates and add-ons are coming much faster with Foundation than Bootstrap IMO.
One thing to note is that while both frameworks are open source, Foundation is backed by a company (Zurb).
I believe Foundation is much better for front-end design than Bootstrap. The main benefit of Bootstrap is in backend design because it managed to get more popular and consequently its much easier to find 'bootstrap ready' js based widgets etc
Maybe I'm misunderstanding what you're saying, but how does Bootstrap's popularity make it better for backend design?
I think he's confusing javascript with "backend".
Backend as in administration systems, rather than frontend which is client-facing?
That's my interpretation of the comment, and real-world experience. I've written two admin sites with Bootstrap because it has all the widgets and plugins I might need on short notice.
Thats exactly what I meant. Sorry for the confusion!
I use Bootstrap exclusively, but I've played with Foundation (back on version 3). But honestly, I can't see what the difference in the frameworks are. Do you have a reference comparing them so that I could see what I'm missing?