If they're not going to report on meaningful things what is the purpose of them still being there then?
I suspect it's money but that just confirms my suspicion of them not being real journalists.
If they're not going to report on meaningful things what is the purpose of them still being there then?
I suspect it's money but that just confirms my suspicion of them not being real journalists.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/18/world/asia/reporter-on-unp...
> Bloomberg L.P., the parent company of Bloomberg News, receives much of its revenue from selling subscriptions for its financial-information terminals. After Bloomberg News published an article in June 2012 on the family wealth of Xi Jinping, at that time the incoming Communist Party chief, sales of Bloomberg terminals in China slowed, as officials ordered state enterprises not to subscribe. Officials also blocked Bloomberg’s website on Chinese servers, and the company has been unable to get residency visas for new journalists.
If you mean in terms of investigative journalism, probably not much purpose. But if you mean in terms of profits, they could run an inoffensive newswire that just reports on business news without digging too deep into sensitive subjects like corruption.