Wow. So this is what it's like to lust after a Microsoft product.
haythamalaa.blogspot.com
haythamalaa.blogspot.com
I'm exhausted.
Also, you do have to give them some credit for using a blog with open comments for their communications channel. They do read those things, so they can listen there as an example. Some credit...OK, just a tiny bit of credit.
http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/people/viola/
(scroll down)
Dr. Paul Viola is also the guy created the first realtime face detector ( the one in openCV ).
This is a great idea along the lines of another thing I've wanted: OCR for math formulas when scanning documents or drawings (some really good computer science documents are out of print or are unavailable in a digital, searchable form).
(I have the X61t, which I think is quite possibly the nicest piece of kit ever. Silly mac users will never understand ;))
What is the CPU, is it LV or ULV and how is the battery life? This is the field where I find all of the existing notebooks lacking. I wish manufacturers have addressed this problem, at least used the existing ULV CPUs!
That said, I'm happy with my X60s, maybe it and the tablets are even the nicest pieces of kit ever, but they could have been made so much better!
Different tablets use different technology. The Wacom tablets use an inductive charge (from the tablet itself) to charge a capacitor on the pen. This means that yes, you need a special stylus. However, because of it, you can get much more precise location and pressure readings. You also don't need to change any batteries in the stylus, as it's powered "over the air."
Powering the pen does consume some energy, but I believe the panels used for TabletPCs can actually be classified as "Low-Power" USB devices, so the drain isn't nearly as much as, say, the hard drive. I'm not sure how efficient the Windows Ink code is, but our driver, which hasn't taken extreme pains to be performant, peaks at about 3% of a 1GHz CPU when the pen is in range.
Oh, nothing. There are two distinct questions of usability that I'm interested in. Except, that X60t tablet is different model form X60 laptop and may use different CPU and battery model, which of course impacts battery life.
The touch is really so-so, but mostly because normal desktop UIs aren't so good with such a large "pointer".
I think you have your answer for power consumption, but I think my tablet is in the same general range as your X60s and probably there will be more variance depending on usage patterns. My two batteries lasted a full day of class using onenote and occasional hops on wifi to download notes, etc.
Regardless, I'm drooling over this. If only you didn't need to use MS word to make it work...
It is simply not enough for there to be some parts of some applications geared towards tablet style interaction, the ENTIRE system needs to be built for it, and Windows with tablet input just wasn't.
However, the ability to add diagrams and sketches to my notes is REALLY nice. Things like this are really compelling: http://www.rohdesign.com/weblog/archives/cat_sketchnotes.htm... But the form factor and responsiveness aren't anywhere near a Moleskine.
Pen input is just so damn natural, but writing over a laptop screen is terrible. Useful ways to map tablet input onto parts of the screen (like this) would be a wonderful middle-ground.
Edit: I'm honestly curious; is this a common emoticon? It seems simple enough that I should've seen it before.
Thanks, that makes sense. I guess I just haven't been on the right sites to see it.
I guess the semicolon could be seen as having a tear coming from one eye, but it's too easy to confuse with a wink.
Edit: I wonder how much of this is straight up OCR and how much of it actually watches how the text is written. Could be some really interesting tech here.
Hold on while I find the better link... Here you go: http://blogs.msdn.com/e7/archive/2009/02/09/recognizing-impr...
I thought this second one was pretty interesting. An EMR company CEO on a forum I sometimes read enthusiastically pushes Win 7 over XP. Apparently it's _much_ better.