I'm sure he's a competent manager, as Balmer seemed to be, but is he a tech visionary?
I'm sure he's a competent manager, as Balmer seemed to be, but is he a tech visionary?
"I arrive here, and the first day I say, 'Let's go look at the product lineup.' And they lay it out, and I said, 'Where's the Taurus?' They said, 'Well, we killed it.' I said, 'What do you mean, you killed it?' 'Well, we made a couple that looked like a football. They didn't sell very well, so we stopped it.' 'You stopped the Taurus?' I said. 'How many billions of dollars does it cost to build brand loyalty around a name?' 'Well, we thought it was so damaged that we named it the Five Hundred.' I said, 'Well, you've got until tomorrow to find a vehicle to put the Taurus name on because that's why I'm here. Then you have two years to make the coolest vehicle that you can possibly make.'?" - http://www.fastcompany.com/1573670/what-other-automakers-can...
As the driver of a sixth-generation (2011) Ford Taurus, which is in fact a pretty cool car, somehow it doesn't seem so crazy that Mulally could save Microsoft as well...
So... we gonna back FrontPage now?
The company logo needs an update too, IMO.
And they have an incredible iconic brand, "Model T", I think they would do well to use it again.
Tarnished can be polished back into good silver.
Even if you say that Microsoft wants a strong future presence in hardware manufacture - building phones and tablets is a very different game than building planes and cars.
He can't possibly be worse-qualified than Ballmer.