Because this is just mathematical cargo-cult scientism. If the basis for deciding "the model itself may require tweaking or redesign" is that "you still think the results look wrong", you're not doing science.
If you're modeling investment growth and your model is:
future_value = investment_amt * (interest_rate ^ num_years)
or future_value = investment_amt * (1 + (interest_rate * num_years))
you might realize after running it a few times and seeing incorrect results that the model is flawed (first case) or inappropriate (second case) and fix it to: future_value = investment_amt * ((1 + interest_rate) ^ num_years)