It's not quite so simple as considering all leaks of government information heroic. For instance, would it have been heroic to leak news that U.S. code breakers had cracked enemy codes in WW2?
(disclaimer: that's a joke)
* Methamphetamine
* "Bath salts" (i.e. MDPV)
* Synthetic cannibinoids
Do even approximations to such boogieman figures even exist?
Absolutely, it would have been heroic. It might have led to real justice instead of ruinous warmongering.
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Events_leading_to_the_attack_on...
The typical line of thinking with conspiracy theories seems to be the less substantiated the theory, the more credence it should be lent, under the logic that the government is suppressing evidence.
So basically the less evidence, the more believable. Beautiful, isn't it?
And where do statements of indeterminate truthfulness fit in?
Secondly, even if it were remotely true, there would have been significant incentives for any involved parties to alter or hide any evidence. History continues to be written by the victors, and crackpots continue to doubt it.
There are many instances of Allied forces breaking codes but not acting on them, because to do so would have signalled to the enemy that their codes had been broken and the advantage would be lost. This comes back to my post further down, most individuals simply don't know the bigger picture!
It's true the US had an isolationist movement, and even business ties to Germany, but it would have eventually entered the war against Nazi Germany. After all, it was already supporting its allies (UK, Soviet Union, etc) via materiel through the Lend-Lease program, before the attack on Pearl Harbor ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lend-lease )
Also, without wanting to diminish the participation of the US in the war, most of the effort was done by other countries, such as the Soviet Union.
Doubtless the final shape of Europe would have been different if the US had entered the war later, but Germany would have been defeated anyway.
If allowing Japan to continue its (quite brutal) invasion of China is what you call justice, I'm not sure we are seeing eye to eye here.
Entering the war made a mess, but so would have staying out of it. The mess was already in motion, it was too late to avoid it either way.
You are implying that there was a good vs evil paradigm with WWII which is completely a USA fallacy.
Both sides were being funded by the central banking cartel. Do you actually think there would be any difference if you were living under Nazi control or not?
Look at all the astroturfing of the phrase "6 million Jews" in WWI before Hitler even came in to power.
[1] Yes, there would be a big difference to living under Nazi control or not. Whether we would know, or care, is another matter. Homosexuality and Judaism would surely be non-existent, but would that bother us if everything around us is 'Nazi' and the very idea of Judaism or Homosexuality didn't exist? Much like most peoples attitudes towards witchcraft. We are all a product of our society.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korean_War#Bombing_North_Korea
"As a result, almost every substantial building in North Korea was destroyed."