Taiwan’s ‘White Shirt Army,’ spurred by Facebook, takes on political parties
washingtonpost.com
washingtonpost.com
Hate to be that guy that pulls the issue back to unification when moving beyond that is so obviously the point of this white shirt movement... but this has really got to stop. Every mainstream news outlet repeats the above in articles about Taiwanese politics, but look absolutely ridiculous when they do so. The Republic of China has governed in various forms since 1912. The People's Republic is the upstart rebellion, and Taiwan the last holdout of the older RoC government. Anything else is a gross rewrite of history and communist propaganda, and really annoying to see in print from an otherwise respectable newspaper.
Is this a lack of fact checking? Or appeasement of mainland China? Either way looks very bad for an independent news organization.
Taiwan is a self-governed sovereignty by most accounts, with its own economy, political system and military. It does not have mainstream international recognition from other countries however, most due to P.R China's pressure. For instance, Taiwan is not part of UN, major nations like US failed to acknowledge it as a independent country due to their reluctance to upsetting mainland China - who frequently threatens open war for such 'treacherous division of the one China'. Therefore, there are only 30 or so countries openly supports Taiwan's independence.
The morality of Taiwan's sovereignty debate obviously takes the narrative of a oppressive dictatorship and its democratic neighbor, but to claim Taiwan or RoC as the legitimate government of China and label P.R. China as the illegal, rogue ruler is far-fetched in the current world's landscape; after all the latter has taken control over the China for over half a century, wield much more political and economical power, and is widely acknowledged as a legitimate country for decades. It's almost like saying US is not a legitimate nation, rather ilegal rebellion against the Great Britain ever since some two hundred years ago.
Sincere question, even though this sounds rhetorical: can you provide a piece of data which suggests Taiwan is not self-governed?
> The political existence of the state is independent of recognition by the other states.
Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States[1]
By this definition it seems there's no meaningful difference between a geographic sub-government as part of a larger whole, and a nation-state in an of itself.
Taiwan has never been part of the PRC. Before its current democratic system, it was a one-party state run by the KMT. Before that, it was under Japanese rule from the 1890s until WWII. Taiwan hasn't been governed by a China government since the Qing Dynasty. That particular country is long gone and is about as connected to the modern day PRC as Hungary is to the Hapsburg Empire.
It's not reunification if the two weren't previously unified.
I believe he was actually making a statement about the legitimacy of the Taiwanese claim to sovereignty over their own island. Mainland claims to ownership over the island have to be argued from a historical context, since they haven't actually had any administrative control over the island for over 100 years. So maaku was responding to this argument (without actually invoking it) by saying that if the question is "who was there first, the KMT or the PRC" then the KMT technically wins since it both predates the PRC and has maintained uninterrupted control until Taiwan became a democracy.
Of course.. the situation is actually more complicated than that because the KMT and PRC are both mainland governments forced upon Taiwan (one successful and one still hoping), while Taiwan has its own history, language, and ethnicities. So in an even broader historical context both are technically "invaders." Such is the fate of all small island nations, perhaps...
Taiwan has been dominated by Han Chinese ever since the 1600s. It is less of "Taiwanese" trying to govern their own island than the ROC fleeing communism to a distant province that was too hard to invade and too small to care about.
Even though it has been left to rule itself mostly for all these years, that does not make it a sovereign nation any more than Hong Kong to China or Puerto Rico to the US.
If Taiwan was an area within China, they wouldn't be able to have this group in the first place and most forms of Democracy would be gone. This is why many of the people are so passionate about their beliefs in staying independent. At the moment, it truly is a free country.
I know many of the social meetup group sites don't work well in China, because you aren't allowed to meet with more than 10 people at a time. I believe it's because the government is afraid you will try to organize a big group to overthrow them.
Here are some more examples:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-23795294
Here is a breakdown of their new "rumor" law:
http://www.dailydot.com/news/china-decree-online-rumors-pris...
This is, of course, unlikely to happen unless something changes drastically on the mainland, making it somewhat of a pointless debate as far as Taiwanese politics is concerned. Unless the PRC invades Taiwan or collapses, there isn't much of a chance for reunification. What the whiteshirts want is to refocus attention on issues that affect Taiwan in the present day.