Top Hacks from a PM Behind Two of Tech's Hottest Products
firstround.com
firstround.com
This is a distinguishing trait of every great manager that I've worked with.
Obviously, all this assumes that it actually was a valid mistake. In the rare case where the failure was caused by gross negligence or intentional misconduct, then you should take responsibility for hiring and trusting them, and then you should fire them.
Outside of the team, ultimately the manager is responsible for delivering. That is their job, and with a good manager, the buck stops at them - without exception. If they don't deliver, it is their failure - even if that failure is a result of their reports failing to deliver, or unrealistic requirements from their superiors. Perhaps the appropriate internal action for that failure is to discipline their reports, but ultimately they are the captain of their ship, and should be the first one on and the last one off.
If it's genuine, or at least convincing, I would agree.
I've witnessed a few attempts at this which clearly didn't meet that criteria and it was nearly the most off-putting managerial song and dance I've ever witnessed.
I get the impression there's a certain group of people who read lists like these online or in a book somewhere and go about mimicking them without understanding the underlying prerequisites.
Eating the failure and giving the success necessarily requires a total understanding of the actual successes and failures.
Without that, the selfless routine is doing everyone a disservice by hiding the actual problems and quashing further discussion that might reveal them.
As a somewhat of an aside, I notice this disturbing tendency a lot in rookie salespeople. One of the bits of sales advice everyone appears to have read in some list somewhere is something about mirroring and first names.
It would creep me out (and trip the "douchebag alert!" signal) every time I spoke to a salesperson who would poorly imitate my mannerisms and keep jamming in my first name between their words.
This guy founded Google? I wish I could have seen the horrified look on the engineers' faces when they heard this idea.
http://skrubu.net/2009/10/07/the-day-google-was-blank/
I think this goes to show that the secret to having better ideas is to have more ideas, and nobody cares about the million that suck, they care about the one that makes you a million.
or has Mr Page done a ridiculous amount of crazy that will never work things?
In order to pick, you must have things to pick between. I'm not sure you can even practice picking without having a backlog.
Would be interested in how Page chooses the ones he will invest personal energy into
I think a lot of the reason it works out is the existence of an external feedback loop, a group of people that are willing to say "Larry, you're insane." Larry is actually pretty good at listening to other people - even now, in the New Google that sometimes does very unpopular things, he's committed to at least hearing out objections and weighing them. When Eric was CEO he also provided a very useful countervailing force to Larry & Sergey's more idiotic ideas, while still letting crazy ones like "Let's build a webmail client!" or "Let's build a browser!" or "Let's buy a mobile phone OS!" go through.
"Computer, search for every time I saw the words 'crazy idea' in the past six months and include how my workspace looked at each occurrence."
Also, the functionality – complete screen archiving and indexing – could be implemented locally. So, its value can be evaluated separately from the question of whether you'd want the screengrabs/indexes living at Google.
What about them?
would you trust them with seeing everything on your screen?
Hell yeah, in an instant, if it meant I had a way of searching everything I'd seen! I'd want a way to turn it off at times ("Incognito mode"), but to me the benefits would be huge.
Especially because the above hinged on higher powered computers. I don't doubt that Google could do this right now...
The one problem with it is that it isn't ambitious enough - it only is helpful with remembering stuff you saw on your computer screen.
If only there was a way to OCR everything you saw, index it all and allow you to search for it again in the future.
Imagine if I could wear some glasses or something, and then they had an app that could do OCR or everything I saw! That would accomplish the "OCR the screen" thing, but expand the scope to things off the computer screen too!
Oh. Wait. http://www.google.com/glass/start/
Damn Larry Page.
Never get lost =s
facepalm
How has tech media gotten so myopic to any history or context outside it? Hell, even within tech Microsoft and Oracle have used that phrase for decades before google was a big deal.
Typing Hackers (people who type fast): https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6659161
Growth Hackers (Marketers): http://growthhackersconference.com/
and with this story, Project Management Hackers (which is a pretty good oxymoron).
I'm sure there's plenty more instances of it being used as a meaningless buzzword.
but am I getting too old ? I prefer people learning to take no for an answer and still knuckling down to work, knowing there will be a yes around the corner. this gets more often and so easier the faster you go.
tiptoeing round Larry Page is clearly good for your career and future prospects, but few of us will work in an office with such personal power differentials. most bosses of us are the same peons as we are - so honesty should have little opportunity cost.
in short, conflict well handled is a good thing.
Looking forward to using some of the points mentioned to work. :)