I usually check rates daily and today is the first day I saw MtGox not offering the highest bid(!)
A better point of comparison would be exchanges that were around at the previous peak, such as Bitstamp or BTC-E.
http://www.coindesk.com/price/
Among other factors, for inclusion in the index, money must be liquid within 7 days.
The matter of the fact is that, some people are doing arbitrage between Gox and other exchanges. And this arbitrage keeps prices somewhat in line. If the arbitrage would not exist, then the prices would be all over the place and not correlate at all.
The question then is, if the Gox$ are all fake and nobody can get any, how come the arbitrageurs can keep in business? And the answer is: they couldn't. Some people get to convert their Gox$ to US$ and then use them to buy bitcoin on other exchanges to sell them on Gox.
But, not all people, for whatever reason, get to do that. And the process might be lengthy, and there's a risk that it might fail for you.
So the spread between Gox and other exchanges is the arbitrageurs estimate of the risk of selling BTC to Gox$ and be able to convert them in a suitable timeframe to US$.
I have heard this before, "Mt.Gox is not a bad company to do business with if you're in Japan." They are not a sham company by any means, they are just hamstrung by US government intervention.
I guess as good becomes more liquid (like USD and gold) then the gap gets reduced.
If you consider the 4 largest exchanges (together about 90% of the volume), then you can look at the price as this fuzzy zone somewhere between the highest and lowest tick.
If you want to know when a specific price has been surprassed comprehensively, it's when all of the top exchanges have gone over it (not just one).
But if you want to know if it's somewhat likely a specific price will be surpassed by all exchanges, then just one going over carries a lot of meaning.
https://support.mtgox.com/entries/21649594-Withdrawals-and-D...
This is interesting because bitcoin is presented as a reliable store of value, but I bet a lot of people who trade on exchanges leave their coins with the exchange for convenience.
So - what if some operators hold less coins than they claim to have, and are shuffling around from a fractional reserve, as you describe?
There would be more coins in the system than actually exist. I get lost in the M1/M3 representation of volumes of money, but that starts to reintroduce some of the confidence problems with paper money.
But - if this problem exists - it will be temporary, and is not inherent to bitcoins. Either the ecosystem will evolve so people stop holding coins at the exchange, or there'll be a couple of run events causing a loss of confidence in exchanges for storage.
It is because US government poached their money.