Henri Lamiraux, iOS Engineering Vice President, leaves Apple after 23 years
9to5mac.com
9to5mac.com
In a way I am not much surprise to see him retiring: I am sure the last 8/9 years since the beginning of the iPhone projects have had a lot of up and down, including stress. He did achieve a lot during his time at Apple and wish him the best retirement possible -which I am sure will not be an issue.
This statement is interesting to me. My understanding of Apple's organizational structure is that individual leaders are given broad responsibility for specific things. As I read this, my impression is that Mr. Lamiraux was the buck-stops-here guy for any and all bugs that come through iOS. (Among other responsibilities.)
Inside Apple, is it that literal? I contrast that with other software companies, where those responsibilities are largely delegated out to many different people, but there is rarely a single person who is accountable. For example, I could never imagine a single, go-to individual at Microsoft who would be responsible for the bug-fixing process in Windows 8.
That said, Apple is a fraction of the size of MS, so it would not at all surprise me if I learned that he has seen my name on bug reports.
I interpret this "managed bug-fixing processes" statement to mean "used Radar (Apple bug tracker) often enough to identify specific process improvements for radar which he then designed and led implementation".
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-compete_clause#California
Microsoft is an interesting thought. He could certainly wrangle the reputed "warring factions" but would he want to? If he is as individualistic as they come, he'd want to start out as the de-facto leader and visionary. And he has the funds to do it. Why bother with Microsoft?
Maybe he'll become a VC?