But instead they just give no raises, or even insult their high performers with a "generous" 3% and cause resentment and lower morale.
But instead they just give no raises, or even insult their high performers with a "generous" 3% and cause resentment and lower morale.
In tech, on the other hand, it can be $70k for a fullfilling job vs $200k for a boring grind in say finance...
But you get useful results if you (a) ask people how happy they are (even if they exaggerate and understate, the ranking is generally accurate), and (b) ask people if they're getting X in the company, and then measure the correlations (and do a bunch of tricky adjustments for factors that are interrelated).
I.e., you don't ask "is a fair boss important for you? are office conditions important for you?" - but, if for example, on average the people who think they have a fair boss are feeling happier than those who think they have an unfair boss; but those who think that the office conditions really suck are just as [un]happy that those who feel that the office is okay - now, that's useful signal.
Median(1,2,3,3,3,4,5) = 3