If you look at the code, e.g.
https://gist.github.com/adamnemecek/7112729/raw/deb521f699d3...
500 million LOC seems less unrealistic.
/s
https://gist.github.com/adamnemecek/7112729/raw/deb521f699d3...
500 million LOC seems less unrealistic.
/s
The 500M figure is quite obviously nonsense. Even if one adds the source of every tool involved, including the browsers used to display the site, it would be difficult to get to 500M. For example, Chrome is ~5M LOC, depending on comments/version.
I can easily believe some overflunky seeing 500M something and not really get what was being measured. I'd believe that more readily than 500MSLOC of actual code.
The BACK end is closed source, made by CGI and others.
But I tend to agree the size claimed has to be way off.
They might be including database rows as "code" who knows.