Do you know why 3D printing is finally taking off? The parents are starting to expire. The technology has been around since the 80's. Try to let that set in how much patents have held back a very important innovation.
Do you know why 3D printing is finally taking off? The parents are starting to expire. The technology has been around since the 80's. Try to let that set in how much patents have held back a very important innovation.
That same history happened with almost every technology since patents existed. Some quite famous examples are the steam engines, electronic valves, and airplanes. It's an easy to spot pattern, new tech just takes off only a patent length interval after it leaves the labs.
That alone is not evidence that patents are bad. But coupled with the fact that most of those techs were concurrently invented by several people (who often got bankrupt, because they couldn't sell their inventions) it becomes very strong evidence.
What if you restrict them to organisations using them in at least one actively marketed and supported product?
What if you make it so a company has to show genuine investment to be granted a patent?
What if you raise the bar on what constitutes innovation to cover a certain degree of complexity?
What if you make it so all patents have to be licensed to a FRAND (genuinely fair, not the current "fair") basis?