What Do Cats See?
mydeals.com
mydeals.com
But a dichromat with say, missing L cones will not simply mix green and red, he will experience "green" totally differently than a trichromat. What a trichromat call green is the result of the stimulation of both M and L cones. We cannot see the pure spectral green. We cannot subtract the L cones contributions to what we experience, and its is quite important. The dichromat won't have any L cones contribution, the physiological stimuli won't be the same. He sees the actual spectral green. A color we have never seen and that we cannot imagine.
Now there is an experiment to do : put a full page of bright red and stare at it for minutes. It will start to become orange-ish. This is your L cones getting tired. Now swiftly switch to a bright green full page (prepare it so you can switch with a key press). You will experience a purer green that you ever experienced, because this green will have less red component to it as your L cones are tired (the effect will last mere seconds and quickly fade into normal green). If you were able to completely remove your L cones, you would see what the dichromat sees.
In trying to explain it some way... the green was SO GREEN that it actually looked like it was flashing blue.
By the way, is there any other similar experiment I could try?
click on the page, toggle between red & green with any keypress
The human images and the cat images are not comparable because the human images represent a subjective impression, rather than a prediction from visual capabilities like the cat images. For example, the human images are crisp right out to near the edges. This is simply inaccurate - you can only read text within a FOV of about 6 degrees.
Here's a link to the video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=piyY-UtyDZw
1. https://stanley.gatech.edu/publications/stanley_dan_1999.pdf
2. And actually on a reread this morning, it doesn't seem that they cross-validated their reconstructions. So perhaps their reconstructed movie frames are actually an overestimation. Regardless, there is no doubt that their technique works and it was a great starting point. Keep in mind: they did this in 1999!
A neighbour's cat and my cat had a argument, no actual fighting - just lots of staring, yowling and that strange growling sound cats make. Nothing too questionable there, but then my cat did something rather strange - she started moving away by walking extremely slowly and I mean extremely slowly. I wondered what on earth she was up to but after reading this article I think it must have something to do with the fact that cats cannot seem to detect very slow motion. It appears that cats can move and position themselves in such a way that it may be undetectable (or nearly so) to another cat.
Of course there may be a completely different explanation, but I like this one.
I am beginning to find Hacker News very tedious when people down-vote posts that they disagree with which were made in good faith.
One very simple step is they recognize the concept of upwind and downwind, not to mention the concept of beaters, ambushers and the ability to dynamically change their strategy when circumstances change.
I have noticed that the cats I know are selectively short sighted. A rival cat from a neighbouring area or a fox can be spotted at considerable distance, however, a 'loved human' has to be relatively close to be acknowledged. This could have been rendered in the images, having it so that 'humans see humans' and 'cats see cats' in otherwise identical scenes.
Cat view - as in a few inches from the ground would not have been that hard to do - how difficult is it to take a photo these days rather than just download something random from the internets?
Furthermore, a cat's eyesight is augmented by an array of whiskers. These can be moved forward and back and are there to work out what something in close quarters is doing or shaped like. The cat has this area covered by the whiskers and has no need to be able to focus there even though we expect them to when we wave something in front of their noses.
Apropos of nothing, I find this a fascinating way of enhancing the link authority of a coupon site. Given algorithm changes at Google which punish sites for little original content, adding a blog like this to your coupon site ups content that allows you to organically rank higher.
Interesting nonetheless.
Also, the glowing trail thing would be a great way only for creatures like us humans, with slowly refreshing visual brains to handle information coming from faster refreshing retinas. But I have to imagine cats have their brains appropriately tuned for the refresh rate if their retinas and see movements clearly, with great detail in the time dimension.
The increase in rods also enhances their “refresh rate”, so that they can pick up movements much faster (very helpful when dealing with small animals that change direction very quickly during a chase)
Also: Interestingly, this also means that humans have the ability to see very slowly moving objects at speeds 10 times slower than cats (that is to say that we can see very slow things move that would not appear to be moving to a cat)
Which made me wonder why sneaking up on a cat chameleon-style doesn't work better.
You could say the same about dogs and many other animals.
http://nickolaylamm.com/art-for-clients/what-do-cats-see/
I was surprised to find that the "Art for Clients" tag on his site contains a lot of content that's gone heavily viral recently (especially "The Average Man" photos, which were on HN a few days ago):
http://nickolaylamm.com/category/art-for-clients/
And all these professional news agencies, presumably with legal teams to back it up, attribute Nickolay Lamm as the source for all of those I checked.
From his "About Me":
> I blog for MyDeals.com, MyVoucherCodes.co.uk and StorageFront.com. Each blog post I make takes around 4 weeks to create.
http://nickolaylamm.com/about-me-2/
I smelled something fishy from the "mydeals.com" source from OP, and initially thought that the Daily Mail's attribution to that site was just sloppy and awful... but it all checks out. Huh.
First and foremost, cats have exceptional olfactory senses.
Second of all, the mouse was likely moving around before it noticed your cat approaching, at which point it froze. (By that time, it was of course too late.) Mice don't typically just sit in a garden, never moving.
Also, another poster makes a good point about cats' hearing. Not only do cats hear in higher frequency ranges than we do thanks to their reduced size, they can angle their ears to 'focus' on a particular sound; being a sound engineer by profession, I desperately envy them this ability. I have simulated this using cardioid microphones while wearing headphones, and I would cheerfully sacrifice a good deal of social standing for a pair of working prehensile ears.
You might have to follow through on that "I would cheerfully sacrifice a good deal of social standing" part, though...
[BED] [BED] [SCRATCHING POST] [BED] [POTTY] [BED] [BED] [BED]