That's not meant to take away from this project - it truly is amazing what can be interpreted in the browser now.
Whilst this is nothing like the several orders of magnitude required for more capable interactive behaviour, it does make my load times noticeably faster than those claimed on the page. :)
(I'm Chrome on Linux, i7 4th Gen, incidentally)
(This value was the average while booting Linux)
8 - 23 MIPS ain't so bad, right?
If you're interested in this, please do make plenty of noise at me to finish. I've got a flight back to the East coast from Portland on Sunday, so I'm hoping I can get most of the browser code finished by then. After that I'm going to be somewhat distracted through the end of January, as I'm moving from Charleston, SC to Christchurch, New Zealand. I could use a bit of motivation to get this done.
Otherwise I think it'd be great to get an image together with all of those tools, especially Lynx. It'd be great if I could make the HN submission to the demo page via the emulator itself. However for now if I can get an ICMP echo I'll be happy.
I think when it's ready I'm going to set up a full-access reCaptcha-protected demo on DigitalOcean or AWS and see what happens. If people don't abuse it and if the bill isn't too bad, I'll leave it up. If not, I'll worry about how to do a restricted demo. It would be nice to get a network-friendly game in there, though.
Another great demo that we'd have difficulty with is browser-in-browser. Chrome-in-chrome, firefox-in-firefox. That would, however, be the ultimate sandbox.
Anyway, get in touch with me via e-mail or better yet, Skype (see profile). We can coordinate better there.
Why? I'm honestly curious since I can't imagine any big advantages over more "classic" setups ...
Ruby's interestingness to performance ratio is not high.
It is a "social" development platform supporting rails, mysql etc.