Philip Hensher stirs debate among authors after refusing to write for free
theguardian.com
theguardian.com
But Hensher does talk about how this would affect those with aspirations to be writers and I don't think we should do anything to encourage young people to become professional writers. Yes, let's encourage them to write, but don't sell them on the dream of making their living that way, because for all but a few people, that's just not possible.
Simply, there are lots of people that want to write, but the number of people paying for writing isn't enough to support very many professional writers. No different than anything else. I may be a Tai Chi master and want to teach Tai Chi (I don't even do Tai Chi, this is just an example), but Tai Chi is something people enjoy doing and there are many other instructor level Tai Chi practitioners. But that doesn't mean there are enough paying Tai Chi students to support all of us.
Besides, there is a confusion in one of the arguments between getting content for free and getting authors to work for free.
I recently left academia on account on account of the exploitative culture and then declared an eternal moratorium on low-academic-value, unpublishable or otherwise uncredited technical work for academia. Perhaps I should start a movement called Technologists Leaving Academia.
I asked why the lucky stiff to do a foreword for my Ruby book several years ago and he did a comic strip! :-) http://www.rubyinside.com/why-the-lucky-stiffs-delightful-fo...
With more academic books, I've noticed that the forewords are more substantial and will refer to the contents of the books and other research in a more precise way. As such, I suspect they're a lot more work, whereas you could bash out a good 3-4 page foreword for a programming book in a few hours if you had the relationships or experiences to lean on.