Interactive map of BART ridership
vudlab.com
vudlab.com
It actually took me about five to ten seconds to see the outline of SF and recognize it because at first I was looking at the water area and thinking "this doesn't look like the bay area".
Overall I think you should use a white or beigish background with black text, and for the map colors use black landmass and water the color of the page background. It will make the page so much easier to read.
(he studies transport engineering and economics, so he actually knows what he's talking about)
"To be clear, I’m saying we should ignore the workers’ welfare beyond what is necessary to (a) provide the best ridership experience and (b) to guarantee BART workers the safety and living standard we regulate, at minimum, for all workers. No more and no less."
That is, the Bay Area public should support BART's side in this dispute, because money spent on labor (benefiting the few) is money that can't be spent on system investment (benefiting the many).
If we want to ensure that BART workers can afford to live in the area, that's an important but separate question, and it's better to address the cost of living broadly* than to treat BART employment as a highly targeted Social Security scheme for train operators and mechanics.
* E.g., substantial increases in the minimum wage, lessening restrictions on new housing, non-profit-oriented health care, and (shocker) effective public transit.
http://enjalot.github.io/bart/ http://www.meetup.com/Bay-Area-d3-User-Group/events/13754175...
For instance, adjacent stations might be expected to have less ridership between them, because in many cases you could walk or bike between them.
Not sure if the data exists, but it would be amazing to see the map change over time, kind of like this: http://hint.fm/wind/
Maybe this one: https://github.com/balanced/balanced-dashboard/issues/93?sou...