The title of the article: "Microsoft Corp pays US$100K bounty to hacking expert who uncovered Windows bug that could have been used to launch remote attacks"
To me, this level of editorializing approaches arbitrarily close to lying.
The title of the article: "Microsoft Corp pays US$100K bounty to hacking expert who uncovered Windows bug that could have been used to launch remote attacks"
To me, this level of editorializing approaches arbitrarily close to lying.
Guy predicts the higgs boson particle.
World renowned physicist Foo Bar, accurantly models existance of boson particle.
---See the difference? The title is BS. I expected a guy from Pakistan or somewhere third world finding the bug.
Your mock headline would be more accurate if it said "physicist models higgs boson". Hacker is a perfectly valid job title for a security researcher.
PS: A security researcher from Pakistan has been bagging a lot of Bug Bounties recently. Look up news on Rafay Baloch
No, they paid US$100k to a white-hat, someone who struggles against black-hat hackers. If a headline can't distinguish between white hats and black hats, educated writers normally add some words to clarify their meaning -- and they did. But the submitter omitted those words. Hence, lying.
Microsoft pays US$100K to hacking expert to launch remote attacks