>but he is a far more professional reporter of facts than the vast majority of mainstream outlets.
Well, if you count lying, writing wrong facts and trying to bash everybody but Apple as professional reporter of facts then yes, he is.
Well, if you count lying, writing wrong facts and trying to bash everybody but Apple as professional reporter of facts then yes, he is.
Just an example, I can pick just any of their articles, they are full of that:
http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2013/03/09/googles-android-pow...
If you can't see the wrong facts and the lies in just that post I can't do more.
I honestly don't see any, but that's because the piece is an unreadable screed of childish invective that doesn't involve many facts. Not because Dilger is lying.
Well, perhaps you also think that Appleinsider is a good site
You are the one who called Dilger a liar but you have not identified any lies he has told. The burden is on you to provide evidence for your accusation.
Merely linking to one of his pieces and saying 'he's a liar' does not prove anything.
Just because you dislike his opinions does not make him a liar.
You can believe what you want, facts will remain, problem with Digler are not his ridiculous opinions.