iCloud Alternative Loom (YC W12) Raises $1.4 Million Seed Round
techcrunch.com
techcrunch.com
Pros: UNLIMITED, available on all devices, social sharing with circles and already fits many of our gmail workflow. No new app to learn and teach others. Not to mention, unlimited videos.
Cons: 2048px max size - but for capturing everyday photos how much larger do we need?
Loom Difference: Looks like loom share a smaller local copy for instant offline access, Google+ can mimic this to a large extend due to caching (and with wifi ALL images are available)
It only does photos and videos, not documents, data and mail/calendar/contacts.
* Read
* Write
* Callback (to sort out paradoxes when two or more devices update the store independently offline and need to merge)
It's possible to do this with CoreData, but poorly, with a high burden on the developer to learn the entirety of Apple's APIs and no way to alert the user as to what it is doing under the hood, which causes the app to hang for minutes or even forever until the managed object context says it's ready.
The reason Loom saves space compared with iCloud is that Loom stores your original photos entirely in the cloud, and not on your device. Loom caches smaller versions of these originals on your phone for fast browsing, organizing, and sharing, and then you can quickly access the originals if you choose.
Everpix is a great service and more affordable than Loom, but the main difference between Loom and Everpix is that we store your files in their original size and resolution, untouched, so if you ever need them, you can get them. Additionally, Loom supports RAW and video uploads.
What is normally the level of dilution after such a round?