That's a cool claim, do you have a source that isn't from mises.org?
Tell me more about functioning markets and how they can only be prevented by government force.
Tell me more about functioning markets and how they can only be prevented by government force.
I don't know why people think the historical lack of monopolies (without government backing) is some right-wing nut-job theory. Not even the robber-barons wielded monopolies that allowed them to engage in "predatory pricing" or the other feared ills of monopolies. Go read about Vanderbilt or Getty or Carnegie. In each of their industries, consumers saw prices fall dramatically, even after each consolidated control over major portions of their respective markets. The fear that they would raise prices dramatically after acquiring their near-monopolies never materialized.
Edit:
>>Tell me more about functioning markets and how they can only be prevented by government force<<
Sorry, I misread your snark. I never said functioning markets can only be prevented by government force (whatever that even means). I'm saying that throughout history, you do not get monopolies that harm consumers unless the government backs the monopoly.