Technology and the College Generation
nytimes.com
nytimes.com
To be fair, I went to a small and very professionally oriented college, not a large university. But this article seemed totally made up to me.
- failure to understand customer needs. There is very little feedback considered in most university processes. It's "if you [student] don't like it, too bad." State schools offer on average less hand-holding compared to Ivys and private, which makes some sense.
- failure to share and integrate between departments, giving the appearance of fragmentation and more work for the served affiliates (students, faculty, staff, visitors, etc)
- failure to adapt to modern technologies fast enough. I started with desktop servers connected on public IPs and Apple Newtons, and ended with rack mounted gear in real datacenters behind hardware firewalls. The problem is partly that budget is yearly, top-down, not based on need. Also, most departments are cost-centers, not profit-centers (we were, so we had more leverage to suggest changes). Combine these and you get reactive capabilities devoid of marketplace competition^ that are a year behind the times, at best. Yeah, pretty nuts for a $160 m dept.
^ Our customers (other departments within the same hierarchy) often owned a-la-carte discretionary funding control over our departments' projects, so there was competition because opting for outside vendors would be loss of funding and more integration work.
This piece doesn't even seem to meet the journalistic standard of a mediocre high school newspaper, much less the NY Times.
My thoughts: The professors and the writer are the ones out of touch here. Were the professors really gullible enough to think that college students don't check their email regularly?
Doing my matura (sort of like the SAT's) I took advance level English just so I could get away from having to know how to properly write an English letter. I got a 98.5% and to this day (~6 years later) I couldn't tell you how to properly format something that is officially recognised as a Letter.
Email has thrown most of the old rules about addressing people out the door. Nothing I learned in elementary or middle school about written communication is even remotely useful these days. The only times those things even remotely come in to play are when I have to write a formal letter to the government.
And even then I just google the correct format.
Except if you're sending encrypted e-mails :)
In that regard a colleague and I now use an incrementing integer for the subject, with occasional skips in the sequence.
These are not people whose second language is English they are native speakers.
This one really bugged me out. I would have expected that they would have been using their knowledge tools to access knowledge - which is probably at least 50% of what I do with my smartphone and 70% of what I do on my laptop. Hopefully they are seeking knowledge through other means and aren't just ignoring one of the best advances of all of mankind.
123 - 31 - 4 = 88
I'm guessing those 88 minutes were spent on web sites found through a search engine.
That school ended up emailing students' personal email accounts to get enough responses because the school's official email solution was so terrible.
“E-mail has never really been a fun thing to use,” said Ms. Judge, 19. “It’s always like, ‘This is something you have to do.’ School is a boring thing. E-mail is a boring thing. It goes together.”
And if they think that college is boring, wait until they have to sit through their first meeting at work.
I was with you until this. Boredom means you are not engaged to your full potential. If the "real world" is even more boring than school, people should be complaining. (And someone should be making a killing on that inefficiency.)
/Churchill
It is hard to believe that people have become some out of touch with each other that they can't figure out basic social etiquette.
At the same time I hop on Xbox and listen to 8 year olds who swear like sailors and think that is how you talk with other people who are "online". So maybe my surprise at the lack of etiquette is that I'm now 34 and can't relate to people half my age.
The regular death threats from people on Youtube who disagree with my stance on Pasteurized Milk should possibly also have been a clue.
I have changed my mind I'm just deluded. Young people have no clue how to interact anymore. (Hey you kids get off my yard)
We haven't. But I think society is currently going through a change in basic social etiquette.
Just like when Shakespeare was alive, English still had a formal and informal "you" (you is the formal, thou the informal if I'm not mistaken). These days an esteemed professor might respond to a long and formally addressed email with "yup".
I've had it happen.
Also, it used to be normal for friends to sign letters with things like "Forever yours and eternally devoted, with love, ~Swizec"
Nowadays ... not so much.
"you" was the plural and "thou" the singular, and, as is the case in several other languages, tradition was to use the plural in formal contexts (sort of the second-person equivalent of the "royal 'we'".)