This gets to the whole issue of "product/market" fit. For some hypothetical market, security
is a show-stopper: Eg, there are people who chose not to use Windows largely based on security concerns.
So for any combination of product attributes, you appeal to some market of size n, and are unappealing to some other market of size z. The question is how do you build a product for which n is sufficiently large, acknowledging that you can't satisfy everybody at the same time.
Expanding beyond just product attributes, this whole discussion aligns with the thinking from The Discipline of Market Leaders which talks about how you can choose to construct your value proposition based on optimizing one of three possible axes (where product excellence is one), while striving for merely "acceptable" on the other two.
Since different markets will purchase based on different value propositions, the important thing (or so the authors argue) is just that you be really good at one of the three, and just good enough at the others.