Hacker News Reader

Comment by abat | Hacker News Reader

They're probably more worried about bad press than the payout for the case. The class action lawyers only care about their own fees. They'll probably get a settlement that involves giving some money to some privacy charity rewarding the lawyers and not actually doing anything to directly benefit the members of the class action.

View on HN

I think the ramifications are bigger than that - heaps of services want unrestricted, virtually unaccountable access to our contacts and address books and quite liberally help themselves to it - like Path earlier this year found to be uploading everyone's address books to their servers.

A best case scenario for us will greatly limit the way and extent companies access our data.

Some services give it regardless of whether it's asked for - I'm specifically thinking of facebook here. I've done a couple of prototype apps with "login with facebook" functionality. Regardless of whether our app requests it or not, facebook automatically says that we're requesting "access to friends list" - that's just one of the minimum levels of things you get, even if you don't want them, and there's no way to not get it.

> They're probably more worried about bad press than the payout for the case.

That makes sense. But they have to weigh the pros of arguing the case in public, versus the cost of exposing their reasoning, such as it is.

Also, by saying they had the right to mine people's address books, but without explaining how they think they acquired the right, they risk a pretty big public backlash.

Exactly. Losing their spot as the business social network would kill them.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com