In other words you just spent a dozen or so paragraphs venting your bullshit detector in a space where numerous contributors that are much, much smarter than you have indicated otherwise.
It's like inverse bike shedding.
It's like inverse bike shedding.
You might want to re-read my original comment and take note of the issues I commented on. If you disagree with what I'm saying, why not respond on those points? I can't help wonder if your problem is actually that I'm interfering with your "I want to believe" circuitry.
I like to distinguish between actual science and mathematics and nonsensical metaphysical claims like "...giving up space and time as fundamental constituents of nature and figuring out how the Big Bang and cosmological evolution of the universe arose out of pure geometry." YMMV.