Costa Concordia: Stricken ship set upright in Italy
bbc.co.uk
bbc.co.uk
[1] http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/magazine/16-03/ff_s...
Reading about things like this makes me question whether I should call myself a software engineer or programmer - somehow what I do doesn't seem in the same category of things these people do.
I actually came to post about this, and was pleased to see your comment in the top spot. The writers of this article (and many other great reads) have since started their own magazine--called Epic Magazine--and feature this story as one of their primary attractors. Perhaps more relevant to the Hacker News crowd, they use a really neat display format for their amazing (but true) stories: http://epicmagazine.com/2013/08/deep-sea-cowboys/
Highly recommended.
That's exactly what they're planning to do once they clean it up enough to be towed away. They seem very worried about the surrounding ecosystem which is, my guess anyway, why they're not just doing it where it lies.
You mean a POORER PLACE first?
It will be moved to a close harbor that can hold the ship (to my knowledge http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piombino is discussed, currently). That sounds like reasonable thing to do.
That said, the ship breaking yards in Bangladesh don't look like pleasant places.
You don't scrap a ship in the middle of the sea, you don't want oil, rotten food, battery acid, sewage, cargo, and any other random stuff that might exist on a ship floating around freely.
In a way, this ship is Italy's Exxon Valdez¹. Irresponsible ship's captain crashes into a reef...
Edit: Okay, so it's a cruise ship, and I can see that amount of rotting (or otherwise) food possibly causing problems on a reef. I was thinking it was the cargo ship that capsized that was referenced in the wired article linked in another comment, which I had read about before. Still interested in specifics of what rotting food may do to an environment if anyone knows though.
I suspect also that the rotting food would consume oxygen in the area, and that would kill some sea life.
Ecosystems in general are chaotic and extremely sensitive, and aquatic ones more so afaik.
Most of the people watching can't get complex ideas, but everyone knows rotting food is smelly so it's a story that sells. And you can't have a smelly beach, it's not like there are starving people in the world.
I can't see it much different to a whale beaching.
Back of the envelope -
4000 eat ~ 1kg per day times 10 days
So approx 40 tonnes of food is in the ship.
You'd have to imagine you'd easily recover 80% and remove it.
The stories I've seen claim that that salvage operation is covered by insurance, so Lloyds (and whoever Lloyds is re-insured with) is picking up the tab.