Also, people aren't going to buy 100 trillion in massages, that is fucking ridiculous, if you start from a ridiculous set of circumstances, you're going to arrive at a ridiculous ending point -- it's not instructive of anything.
Also, people aren't going to buy 100 trillion in massages, that is fucking ridiculous, if you start from a ridiculous set of circumstances, you're going to arrive at a ridiculous ending point -- it's not instructive of anything.
What is the problem with a toy model in extreme to illustrate the absurdity of your position?
>What is the problem with a toy model in extreme to illustrate the absurdity of your position?
It's not illustrative of anything, other than a contrived absurd example.
If there was capacity to absorb 100 trillion in massages (equally absurd), then prices would remain stable.
Think of it like this: we hit a recession, orders drop and companies lay off workers and produce less output. From one day to the next the capacity for a certain level of output remains the same, but on the second day less is produced.