MS just announced some pretty awesome stuff for the Xbox
gizmodo.com
gizmodo.com
http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/e3xbox/e3xbox300.jpg
I don't think that yellow thing to the left is a camera, but if both those other holes are cameras, then that would mean the XBox could indeed be getting full 3D information on you, and that really does open up some interesting possibilities. I doubt the demos are possible with silhouettes, but with full 3D information... maybe.
I remain skeptical until I try it, but I have to admit I'm intrigued. This really could be a big deal. It's cool not because current games will translate to this; they're all specialized for current controllers. It's cool because this will enable new things, some of which are things that the Wii seemed to hint at but doesn't seem to have been able to execute on.
I've worked with the ZCam and its kind of finicky - its very sensitive to how the depth sensor is calibrated. Also, the depth sensing doesn't work well with reflective surfaces that I've seen. I'm curious if/how they've gotten around those issues.
That said, I'm a little skeptical, the lack of any sort of tactile feedback, even just holding an object, may be awkward.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=03thQvGRVvQ&feature=playe...
I just hope it works as advertised and I hope it has an easy to use API/SDK.
Ow.
This thing is going to absolutely destroy the Wii, if it works as advertised...
This is quite bad at gestures though, particularly when the front of the Wiimote is pointed away from the sensor bar (as it is in games like boxing and tennis). In these cases, lacking a visual way to tell movement, the controller relies entirely on the accelerometer, which while theoretically capable, saturate very quickly with full body motion.
This is why in Raving Rabbids, where you have to play rabbid-DDR with the music, you have to jerk the controller - the accelerometer is neither reliable nor accurate enough to reliably infer your intentions through light motions.
What will be interesting to see is how Sony responds to this. If the Xbox 360 software wasn't already a million times better than the PS3 software, project Natal seems hellbent on making it so. And Sony, unlike Nintendo, have a platform which to some extent allows expansion and further development.
Definitely interesting times ahead in the console world.
1: http://hackmii.com/2009/02/why-the-wii-will-never-get-any-be...
So the problem Microsoft has is that there will not be a large library to take advantage of the Natal. It seems like it'll be another eyetoy. The Natal will probably sell a decent amount, but its use will languish from a lack of compatible games.
And right now the wii is known for family and group games. One good product launch by Microsoft is not going to change that. Also, unless Microsoft lowers prices, or puts a new bundle out, the wii will probably be cheaper.
A media center that allows one-click videoconferencing with your TV, bundled with a Minority Report style photo album viewer, DVD player, AND has the ability to play games.
If the price isn't anything outrageous I can see fast adoption. Oh, and they have Square Enix lined up. I'd bet it's a worthy contender.
If it did work that would change games and tv apps so much more than the wii could ever do.
Buzz (Quiz game) with voice recognition is a killer feature. (My mother in law would probably buy one for that)
On an unrelated note, I wonder if/how they're going to prevent it being used for porn. Obviously they won't allow porn games but the video chat + bored teens makes that kind of activity pretty much inevitable.
There are already porn avatars aplenty. That will make "sexting" visible -- instead of writing and imagining it, you'll just see it. The imagery is probably better with well written text, though. Your imagination is the most vivid rendering system there is.
All that has to happen is for SecondLife to get the interface.
Call me ridiculous, but have they not considered the possibility of releasing a web browser instead? Then people could have twitter, facebook, last.fm, and whatever else they want. Why is this so hard for microsoft to do?
Having said that, the xBox hardware is so noisy it's not a good machine to use for much apart from gaming.
Also, needing to have the disc in place to play HDD games is ridiculous. No question about it.
If they have actually solved the hard problems involved in making this technology work, it's extremely cool.
If they have not, it's somewhat akin to a video suggesting that they'll build technology to allow people to fly without any equipment, just by flapping their arms.
http://gizmodo.com/5273957/microsoft-e3-keynote-archive?skyl...
I'm really looking forward to CoD Modern Warfare 2 - the trailer looks ridiculous. I've wanted a new video card for a while, but I'm not going to let myself buy one (or an accompanying 24" monitor) until I get my product launched. Looks like my deadline is November.